Personal reasons · 7 min
Dismissed without warning – is your employer allowed to do that?
There is no general statutory requirement for a written warning before dismissal. However, in dismissals for personal reasons, it often matters greatly whether you have been told about the shortcomings and given a chance to correct them.
Editorial team,Felaktigt Uppsagd
Many people who are dismissed describe the news as coming completely out of the blue. Whether this was permissible depends primarily on the grounds given by the employer: redundancy, personal reasons, or summary dismissal.
There is no general rule requiring a warning
LAS contains no express requirement for the employer to have given a written warning before dismissal. Nevertheless, this does not mean that an unexpected dismissal is always lawful. The decisive issue is whether the dismissal is based on objective reasons under Section 7 of LAS.
In cases involving personal reasons, earlier reprimands often matter greatly
In a dismissal for personal reasons, an overall assessment is made, taking into account, among other things, the circumstances set out in Section 7a of LAS. Under case law, it often matters whether the employer has clarified the shortcomings, the applicable expectations, and the fact that employment may be at risk if nothing changes. If this is entirely absent, it may weigh against the existence of objective reasons, but this always depends on the seriousness of what happened.
In serious situations, such as a criminal offence against the employer, dismissal or summary dismissal may in certain cases occur without a prior warning. Each case is assessed individually.
Warnings are not relevant in redundancy cases
A dismissal on grounds of redundancy does not relate to you personally, so a warning has no place in the assessment. Instead, the review considers matters such as whether the redundancy is genuine, whether redeployment has been considered, and whether the selection order has been followed.
The employer must still notify you in advance
Even where no warning is required, the employer has procedural obligations. For dismissal for personal reasons, the employer must, as a general rule, notify you at least two weeks in advance under Section 30 of LAS, and for summary dismissal at least one week in advance (Section 31 of LAS). If you are a union member, the union must also be notified. The dismissal notice must be in writing and contain information on how to challenge it (Section 8 of LAS).
Failure to comply with the formal requirements may give rise to an entitlement to damages, although it does not in itself make the dismissal invalid.
What you can do
- Keep the dismissal notice and write down when and how you received it.
- Gather emails, performance reviews, and other material showing what feedback you have or have not received previously.
- Note whether you received advance notification and whether the union was informed.
- Act quickly. If you want the dismissal to be declared invalid, you must generally notify the employer within two weeks (Section 40 of LAS). The time limit may vary.
If you would like help understanding your situation, you can describe it for a free initial assessment.
Frequently asked questions
Must the employer give a written warning before dismissal?
No, there is no general statutory requirement for a written warning. In cases involving personal reasons, however, it often matters whether you have previously been clearly informed about the shortcomings.
Does the same apply to summary dismissal?
Summary dismissal requires you to have grossly neglected your obligations towards the employer (Section 18 of LAS). In situations this serious, a warning is not normally required, but the threshold for summary dismissal is high.
Is a verbal reprimand sufficient?
A reprimand does not have to be in writing to be relevant, but it may be harder to prove what was actually said. What usually matters is whether the message was clear.
Is the dismissal invalid if I received no advance notification under Section 30?
Not for that reason alone. Deficiencies in the notification may instead give rise to an entitlement to damages. Whether the dismissal lacks objective reasons is a separate question.
Sources
- Employment Protection Act (1982:80) (Swedish Parliament)
- Judgments of the Swedish Labour Court (Swedish Labour Court)
The information on this page is general and does not constitute an assessment of your individual case. Rules may change and collective agreements may contain different provisions. Contact us for an assessment of your specific situation.
